返回首页
 【公告】 1. 本网即日起只接受电子邮箱投稿,不便之处,请谅解! 2. 所有文章的评论功能暂时关闭,主要是不堪广告骚扰。需要讨论的,可到本网留言专区。 
学界动态
好汉反剽
社科论丛
校园文化
好汉教苑
好汉哲学
学习方法
心灵抚慰
好汉人生
好汉管理
学术服务
好汉网主
说好汉网
English
学术商城
学术交友
访客留言
世界天气
万年日历
学术吧台
各国会议
在线聊天
设为首页
加入收藏

首页  »  English

Constructive synthesis

作者  |  来源于GreatMan  |  编辑于2008/8/20 23:07:25  |  浏览  次
分享到新浪微博+ 分享到QQ空间+ 分享到腾讯微博+ 分享到人人网+ 分享到开心网+ 分享到百度搜藏+ 分享到淘宝+ 分享到网易微博+ 分享到Facebook脸谱网+ 分享到Twitter推特网+ 用邮件推荐给朋友+ 打印

 

The most problematic part, and it is a crucial part of Piaget as I understand him, is that the constructive synthesis comes about through the "functional overlaps"--that is through the way the schemes are functional in regard to our knowing the external world.  This idea is supposed to ensure that the new structures retain and improve upon the the earlier ones in regard to their functionality for knowing the world.  (That is to say, if the new structures were generated from mechanisms of coordination that did not include guidance form the external world, the mechanism for producing new structures would not necessarily produce structures that were more functional for knowing the external world than the earlier one, and one would need to account for this in some other way).   I think that this puts a big wrench in the relationship Piaget tried to draw between the intellectual's development through qualitatively different structures, on one hand, and the mechanisms that account for the changing conceptualizations we develop in scientific activity.  In the latter case surely no method intrinsic to the generation of new systems of  ideas guarantees their greater functionality than previously existing systems of  ideas.